Government of Gujarat vs BHARAT BACHUBHAI GEDANI — 2490/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020034782025
Filing Number
2490/2025
Filing Date
17-Oct-2025
Registration No
2490/2025
Registration Date
17-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185007250247
Police Station
SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.BHARAT BACHUBHAI GEDANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary of CC.No.2490/2025 The court convicted Bharat Bachubhai Gedani under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for possession of illicit liquor. The accused was sentenced to imprisonment of 150 rupees (fine) with the option of one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his circumstances and the principle that courts should impose minimum sentences when adequate grounds exist for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2490/2025
Summary of CC.No.2490/2025 The court convicted Bharat Bachubhai Gedani under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for possession of illicit liquor. The accused was sentenced to imprisonment of 150 rupees (fine) with the option of one day simple imprisonment in default, considering his circumstances and the principle that courts should impose minimum sentences when adequate grounds exist for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts