SHREE RAM FINANCE THROUGH POWER OF ATTERNY HOLDER DILIP PUNJABHAI DUVA vs RAMDE BHAYABHAI KARMUR — 2480/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020034672025
Filing Number
2480/2025
Filing Date
16-Oct-2025
Registration No
2480/2025
Registration Date
16-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOK ADALA
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHREE RAM FINANCE THROUGH POWER OF ATTERNY HOLDER DILIP PUNJABHAI DUVA
Adv. H V BANDHIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMDE BHAYABHAI KARMUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the petition filed by Shree Ram Finance against respondent Ramde Bhayabhai Karmur. The court directed acquittal of the accused under BNS Section 280 and imposed costs on the petitioner. The case was disposed with the court ordering that the bail granted to the accused be cancelled and all court fees be recovered from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
17-Jan-2026
Judgement
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
23-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge
-
16-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
16-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2480/2025
The court dismissed the petition filed by Shree Ram Finance against respondent Ramde Bhayabhai Karmur. The court directed acquittal of the accused under BNS Section 280 and imposed costs on the petitioner. The case was disposed with the court ordering that the bail granted to the accused be cancelled and all court fees be recovered from the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts