Government of Gujarat vs PRATAPSINH RUPSANG GOHIL — 2449/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020034252025
Filing Number
2449/2025
Filing Date
15-Oct-2025
Registration No
2449/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008250292
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.PRATAPSINH RUPSANG GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Case Summary: CC.No.2449/2025 The court sentenced Pratapsinh Rupsang Gohil to rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and a fine of Rs. 150 under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, after he voluntarily confessed to the offense during police investigation despite being entitled to deny the charges. The court applied the principle that while sentences can be reduced based on sufficient and reasonable grounds, this case warranted the prescribed punishment given the circumstances, and imposed a shorter alternative sentence of simple imprisonment for one day if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
21-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2449/2025
Case Summary: CC.No.2449/2025 The court sentenced Pratapsinh Rupsang Gohil to rigorous imprisonment for 6 months and a fine of Rs. 150 under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, after he voluntarily confessed to the offense during police investigation despite being entitled to deny the charges. The court applied the principle that while sentences can be reduced based on sufficient and reasonable grounds, this case warranted the prescribed punishment given the circumstances, and imposed a shorter alternative sentence of simple imprisonment for one day if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts