PASWIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED vs PRAVINBHAI KARUBHAI GADHAVI Advocate - K M NIMAVAT — 141/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWE on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT

CNR: GJDW020033992023

Filing Number

141/2023

Filing Date

03-Oct-2023

Registration No

141/2023

Registration Date

03-Oct-2023

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PARTLY ALLOWE

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PASWIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED

    Adv. K D VADGAMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRAVINBHAI KARUBHAI GADHAVI Advocate - K M NIMAVAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary: PASWIM Gujarat Vij Company Limited v. Pravinbhai Karubhai Gadhavi Court Decision: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's claim. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 1,80,866.74/- as outstanding electricity dues along with 6% simple interest from the date of the claim until payment is made. The defendant was also directed to pay the plaintiff's legal costs and bear court expenses. Key Facts & Reasoning: The plaintiff electricity company alleged the defendant illegally tapped into its power line without authorization and consumed 2,309 watts of electricity without a valid connection or meter. The court found the defendant guilty of electricity theft based on documentary evidence including inspection reports, testing certificates, and bills. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 18% interest, instead awarding 6% simple interest, holding that no written agreement existed between the parties for the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 28-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 19-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 09-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 11-Nov-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 07-Oct-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 09-Sep-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 12-Aug-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 12-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 04-Jul-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 20-Jun-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 05-May-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 05-Apr-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 08-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 07-Mar-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 07-Feb-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 10-Jan-2025

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 13-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 07-Dec-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 22-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 08-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 04-Oct-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 09-Sep-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 20-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 20-Jul-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 22-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 14-Jun-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 10-May-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 23-Apr-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 19-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 05-Mar-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 20-Feb-2024

    Plaintiff Evidence

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 03-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 17-Jan-2024

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 20-Dec-2023

    Written Statement/Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 04-Dec-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 03-Nov-2023

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 03-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 03-Oct-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 141/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: PASWIM Gujarat Vij Company Limited v. Pravinbhai Karubhai Gadhavi Court Decision: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's claim. The defendant was ordered to pay Rs. 1,80,866.74/- as outstanding electricity dues along with 6% simple interest from the date of the claim until payment is made. The defendant was also directed to pay the plaintiff's legal costs and bear court expenses. Key Facts & Reasoning: The plaintiff electricity company alleged the defendant illegally tapped into its power line without authorization and consumed 2,309 watts of electricity without a valid connection or meter. The court found the defendant guilty of electricity theft based on documentary evidence including inspection reports, testing certificates, and bills. However, the court rejected the plaintiff's claim for 18% interest, instead awarding 6% simple interest, holding that no written agreement existed between the parties for the higher rate. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case