Government of Gujarat vs DIPAK KESHURBHAI SUVA Advocate - J R KARMUR — 2361/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 4-5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020032772025
Filing Number
2361/2025
Filing Date
30-09-2025
Registration No
2361/2025
Registration Date
30-09-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251300
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
DIPAK KESHURBHAI SUVA Advocate - J R KARMUR
VIKRAM RAMBHAI DANGAR
GOVIND MERANBHAI SUVA
AEBHA DHANABHAI CHANDRAVADIYA
ALA VAJASHIBHAI SUVA
MASHARI FOGABHAI DANGAR
KHIMANANDBHAI MERAMANBHAI SUVA
MERAMAN DHANANTBHAI SUVA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 12-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 21-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted all eight accused persons in a criminal case involving alleged illegal sugar manufacturing and possession under Gujarat law Section 145. The judgment found insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses and noted contradictions in prosecution testimony, particularly regarding proper warrant procedures and seizure documentation, leading to acquittal on grounds that guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted all eight accused persons in a criminal case involving alleged illegal sugar manufacturing and possession under Gujarat law Section 145. The judgment found insufficient corroborating evidence from independent witnesses and noted contradictions in prosecution testimony, particularly regarding proper warrant procedures and seizure documentation, leading to acquittal on grounds that guilt was not proven beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts