Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI SAKUBHAI GOHIL — 2291/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020031922025
Filing Number
2291/2025
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Registration No
2291/2025
Registration Date
25-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004250818
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAMESHBHAI SAKUBHAI GOHIL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
The court convicted respondent Rameshbhai Sakubhai Gohil under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of alcohol. While the respondent initially pleaded not guilty but later voluntarily confessed to the charge, the court sentenced him to imprisonment for one day (already served) and a fine of Rs. 150, considering his personal circumstances and the principle that lesser punishment may be justified when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
06-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
29-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
25-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2291/2025
The court convicted respondent Rameshbhai Sakubhai Gohil under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of alcohol. While the respondent initially pleaded not guilty but later voluntarily confessed to the charge, the court sentenced him to imprisonment for one day (already served) and a fine of Rs. 150, considering his personal circumstances and the principle that lesser punishment may be justified when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts