Government of Gujarat vs MILAN LIRABHAI NAKUM — 2269/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020031702025
Filing Number
2269/2025
Filing Date
24-Sep-2025
Registration No
2269/2025
Registration Date
24-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251271
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.MILAN LIRABHAI NAKUM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order
Summary of Case CC.No.2269/2025 The court convicted respondent Milan Lirabhai Nakum under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illicit liquor possession. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 150 (or simple imprisonment for one day if fine remains unpaid), considering his circumstances, socio-economic status, and the principle that lesser punishment is justified when adequate and special reasons exist for mitigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
23-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
22-Jan-2026
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2269/2025
Summary of Case CC.No.2269/2025 The court convicted respondent Milan Lirabhai Nakum under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illicit liquor possession. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 150 (or simple imprisonment for one day if fine remains unpaid), considering his circumstances, socio-economic status, and the principle that lesser punishment is justified when adequate and special reasons exist for mitigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts