Government of Gujarat vs SURESH ALIAS DINESH RANMAL MAKVANA Advocate - R H DANGAR — 2220/2025
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 4,5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 27th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020030962025
Filing Number
2220/2025
Filing Date
19-Sep-2025
Registration No
2220/2025
Registration Date
19-Sep-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
27-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
Last updated 27-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004251223
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SURESH ALIAS DINESH RANMAL MAKVANA Advocate - R H DANGAR
-
2.RAMESH KAYABHAI DAGARA
Adv. null
-
3.PRAVIN NATHABHAI MAKVANA
Adv. null
-
4.VIJAY RAJUBHAI DHAVAL
Adv. null
-
5.BUDHDHABHAI PABABHAI MAKVANA
Adv. null
-
6.GIRDHAR RANABHAI ROSHIYA
Adv. null
-
7.SHITALBEN D.O. RAJU UGABHAI DHAVAL
Adv. null
-
8.HIRIBEN W.O. SURESH RANMALBHAI MAKVANA
Adv. null
-
9.HANSABEN W.O. VIRJIBHAI BATHVAR
Adv. null
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary: Case 2220/2025 The Gujarat High Court acquitted nine accused persons of sugar smuggling charges under the Gujarat Excise Act, Section 145. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical deficiencies: the five-member panel of witnesses testified inconsistently and could not corroborate the prosecution's theory, the seized evidence lacked proper documentation, and the investigation was procedurally flawed with compromised chain of custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
17-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
28-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
15-Dec-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
26-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Nov-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Oct-2025
Process To Accused
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 2220/2025
Summary: Case 2220/2025 The Gujarat High Court acquitted nine accused persons of sugar smuggling charges under the Gujarat Excise Act, Section 145. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case beyond reasonable doubt, noting critical deficiencies: the five-member panel of witnesses testified inconsistently and could not corroborate the prosecution's theory, the seized evidence lacked proper documentation, and the investigation was procedurally flawed with compromised chain of custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts