PASWIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED vs ABUBAKAR SULEMAN CHANGDA Advocate - R M JAM — 107/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 37,. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWE on 07th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJDW020026142023
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
107/2023
Filing Date
17-08-2023
Registration No
107/2023
Registration Date
17-08-2023
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
07th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PASWIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED
Adv. K D VADGAMA
Respondent(s)
ABUBAKAR SULEMAN CHANGDA Advocate - R M JAM
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 27-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 06-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The Gujarat High Court partially allowed the electricity company's petition against a customer accused of electricity theft. The court found the defendant unlawfully drew 3,575 watts of electricity without proper authorization and ordered him to pay the outstanding bill of ₹1,73,217.87 plus 18% annual interest from the bill date until payment, along with court costs. However, the court rejected the company's claim for interest at a different rate and awarded a partial decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The Gujarat High Court partially allowed the electricity company's petition against a customer accused of electricity theft. The court found the defendant unlawfully drew 3,575 watts of electricity without proper authorization and ordered him to pay the outstanding bill of ₹1,73,217.87 plus 18% annual interest from the bill date until payment, along with court costs. However, the court rejected the company's claim for interest at a different rate and awarded a partial decision based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts