RABHIYABEN ALTAFBHAI MARAJ D/O LATIF DAUD BAROYA vs ALTAFBHAI ISHAKBHAI MARAJ Advocate - K F SHEKH — 202/2025

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAW on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC APPLICATION JMFC

CNR: GJDW020018932025

Filing Number

202/2025

Filing Date

16-Jun-2025

Registration No

202/2025

Registration Date

16-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAW

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RABHIYABEN ALTAFBHAI MARAJ D/O LATIF DAUD BAROYA

    Adv. M K SODHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALTAFBHAI ISHAKBHAI MARAJ Advocate - K F SHEKH

  2. 2.ROSHANBEN IKBALBHAI MARAJ

  3. 3.ISMAIL MARAJ

  4. 4.AJIM ISHAK MARAJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the petition after finding that the parties had already reached a settlement regarding their dispute. The petitioner sought relief through a video recording as evidence, but the court determined this was unnecessary given the amicable resolution already achieved between the parties. The case was disposed of on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  7. 17-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  10. 15-Dec-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  11. 25-Nov-2025

    Reply

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  12. 15-Nov-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  13. 07-Nov-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  15. 27-Oct-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  16. 09-Oct-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  17. 24-Sep-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  18. 28-Aug-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  19. 07-Aug-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  20. 17-Jul-2025

    Process To Opponent

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  21. 16-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  22. 16-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 202/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the petition after finding that the parties had already reached a settlement regarding their dispute. The petitioner sought relief through a video recording as evidence, but the court determined this was unnecessary given the amicable resolution already achieved between the parties. The case was disposed of on March 14, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case