Government of Gujarat vs VIRPAL HARDASBHAI MASURA Advocate - D V SAYANI — 1054/2024

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 4,5. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 18th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020014522024

Case disposed

Filing Number

1054/2024

Filing Date

17-05-2024

Registration No

1054/2024

Registration Date

17-05-2024

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004240667

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

PUBLIC GAMBLING ACT, 1867 [SECTION 1 18] Section 4,5

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

VIRPAL HARDASBHAI MASURA Advocate - D V SAYANI

ALIAKBAR RAJAK SANGHAR

AJIJ JUMABHAI SURANI

GHARA JESHABHAI DHARANI

GOVINDGAR NATHUGAR GOSAI

UMAR KASAMBHAI BANDRI

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

18-03-2026

Disposed

12-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

28-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

10-02-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

The court acquitted all six accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 4 and 5) due to insufficient prosecution evidence and procedural irregularities. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case conclusively, noting critical weaknesses including unreliable witness testimony and compromised investigation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all six accused of charges under the Gujarat Prohibition Act (Sections 4 and 5) due to insufficient prosecution evidence and procedural irregularities. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish its case conclusively, noting critical weaknesses including unreliable witness testimony and compromised investigation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case