Government of Gujarat vs MUSTAK JAKIR AAMDANI Advocate - R N JADEJA — 778/2025
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65E,81,98(2). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA on 25th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020010402025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
778/2025
Filing Date
25-03-2025
Registration No
778/2025
Registration Date
25-03-2025
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTA
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008250008
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
MUSTAK JAKIR AAMDANI Advocate - R N JADEJA
AFROJ ALIAS ANISH LATIFBHAI SANGHAR
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 16-01-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 17-12-2025 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Khambhaliya First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1955, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish a credible chain of custody for the seized liquor and that the magistrate's inquest proceedings were procedurally deficient, with the five panch witnesses unable to provide meaningful corroboration of the seizure details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Khambhaliya First Class Judicial Magistrate Court acquitted two accused persons of charges under the Prohibition Act, 1955, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish a credible chain of custody for the seized liquor and that the magistrate's inquest proceedings were procedurally deficient, with the five panch witnesses unable to provide meaningful corroboration of the seizure details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts