Government of Gujarat vs RANA KARIMBHAI KAPADIYA — 714/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010372026

Filing Number

714/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

714/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007260011

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RANA KARIMBHAI KAPADIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.714/2026 The court convicted Rana Karimbhai Kapadiya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended in 2016) for possessing and transporting illicit liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and requested leniency, which the court considered as a mitigating factor. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (fine) with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment, exercising discretion to impose reduced punishment based on his circumstances and remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 714/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.714/2026 The court convicted Rana Karimbhai Kapadiya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended in 2016) for possessing and transporting illicit liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and requested leniency, which the court considered as a mitigating factor. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (fine) with an alternative of one day simple imprisonment, exercising discretion to impose reduced punishment based on his circumstances and remorse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case