Government of Gujarat vs SABIR OSAMAN BHAYA — 712/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010352026

Filing Number

712/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

712/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250440

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SABIR OSAMAN BHAYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    SUMMARY In Case 712/2026, the court convicted Sabir Osaman Bhaya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering his circumstances and background, imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment of up to three months (in lieu of fine) and a fine of Rs. 150/- (rupees one hundred fifty only), applying the principle that courts have discretion to impose lighter punishment when adequate and reasonable grounds exist, rather than the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 712/2026

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY In Case 712/2026, the court convicted Sabir Osaman Bhaya under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering his circumstances and background, imposed a reduced sentence of imprisonment of up to three months (in lieu of fine) and a fine of Rs. 150/- (rupees one hundred fifty only), applying the principle that courts have discretion to impose lighter punishment when adequate and reasonable grounds exist, rather than the statutory minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case