Government of Gujarat vs DARSHAK DINESHBHAI KAVA — 711/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010342026

Filing Number

711/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

711/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250445

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DARSHAK DINESHBHAI KAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 711/2026 Court Decision: The court convicted Darshak Dineshbhai Kava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day. The court found sufficient grounds for conviction based on the accused's voluntary confession and ruled that lighter punishment was justified considering the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 711/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 711/2026 Court Decision: The court convicted Darshak Dineshbhai Kava under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b), and sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day. The court found sufficient grounds for conviction based on the accused's voluntary confession and ruled that lighter punishment was justified considering the accused's circumstances and rehabilitation potential. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case