Government of Gujarat vs RAVAJI GOKALDAS DHANKECHA — 710/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010332026

Case disposed

Filing Number

710/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

710/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250442

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAVAJI GOKALDAS DHANKECHA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Case Summary: CC.No.710/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Ravaji Gokaldas Dhankecha The court convicted the respondent under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended 2016) for possessing illicit liquor. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and sought leniency. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine, recognizing sufficient and justifiable reasons for imposing reduced punishment rather than the minimum statutory sentence, considering the respondent's circumstances and potential for rehabilitation in society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.710/2026 Government of Gujarat v. Ravaji Gokaldas Dhankecha The court convicted the respondent under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended 2016) for possessing illicit liquor. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and sought leniency. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine, recognizing sufficient and justifiable reasons for imposing reduced punishment rather than the minimum statutory sentence, considering the respondent's circumstances and potential for rehabilitation in society. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case