Government of Gujarat vs AJAYKUMAR ALIAS GUDDU HARISHANKAR KASHYAP — 693/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010162026

Filing Number

693/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

693/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260189

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AJAYKUMAR ALIAS GUDDU HARISHANKAR KASHYAP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Ajaykumar alias Guddu Harishankar Kashyap under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and filed a plea for lenient sentencing. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 (three hundred rupees only), and ordered simple imprisonment for two days in default of fine payment, considering the circumstances and established legal principles favoring minimal punishment where adequate and justified reasons exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 693/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Ajaykumar alias Guddu Harishankar Kashyap under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and filed a plea for lenient sentencing. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 300 (three hundred rupees only), and ordered simple imprisonment for two days in default of fine payment, considering the circumstances and established legal principles favoring minimal punishment where adequate and justified reasons exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case