Government of Gujarat vs FULCHAND CHANDRESHENBHAI KASHYAP — 692/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65-A-A. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010152026

Case disposed

Filing Number

692/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

692/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260188

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 65-A-A

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

FULCHAND CHANDRESHENBHAI KASHYAP

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary of Case 692/2026: The court convicted Fulchand Chandreshenbhai Kashyap under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendments, finding that although the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense, the investigation was procedurally deficient. The court imposed a fine of ₹300 (three hundred rupees) as punishment, considering the accused's circumstances and mitigating factors, while rejecting the prosecution's demand for harsher penalties based on principles of proportionate justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 692/2026: The court convicted Fulchand Chandreshenbhai Kashyap under Section 65 of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendments, finding that although the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense, the investigation was procedurally deficient. The court imposed a fine of ₹300 (three hundred rupees) as punishment, considering the accused's circumstances and mitigating factors, while rejecting the prosecution's demand for harsher penalties based on principles of proportionate justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case