Government of Gujarat vs HITEN BABUBHAI DORU — 689/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1),85(3). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010122026

Filing Number

689/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

689/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260056

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B,85(1),85(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HITEN BABUBHAI DORU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.689/2026 The court convicted respondent Hiten Babubhai Doru under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and 2016 amendments (Sections 66(1)(b), 65(1), 65(3)) for illegal possession of alcohol, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment as alternative. The court found sufficient and credible reasons to impose a reduced sentence considering the respondent's circumstances, holding that while the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense, mitigating factors warranted a lighter punishment than the statutory minimum prescribed under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 689/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.689/2026 The court convicted respondent Hiten Babubhai Doru under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949 and 2016 amendments (Sections 66(1)(b), 65(1), 65(3)) for illegal possession of alcohol, sentencing him to a fine of Rs. 500 with simple imprisonment as alternative. The court found sufficient and credible reasons to impose a reduced sentence considering the respondent's circumstances, holding that while the accused voluntarily confessed to the offense, mitigating factors warranted a lighter punishment than the statutory minimum prescribed under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case