Government of Gujarat vs SIDHDHARAJSINH PRAVINSINH JETHVA — 682/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020010052026
Filing Number
682/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
682/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004260278
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.SIDHDHARAJSINH PRAVINSINH JETHVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
The Additional District Magistrate Court in Khambhaliya convicted Siddhrajsinh Pravinsinh Jethva under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)) for driving without a valid permit and operating a vehicle under the influence. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of seven days and a fine of ₹2,150, considering mitigating factors such as his first-time offense, economically disadvantaged background, and family circumstances, while imposing a lighter punishment than the statutory minimum to serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 682/2026
The Additional District Magistrate Court in Khambhaliya convicted Siddhrajsinh Pravinsinh Jethva under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)) for driving without a valid permit and operating a vehicle under the influence. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of seven days and a fine of ₹2,150, considering mitigating factors such as his first-time offense, economically disadvantaged background, and family circumstances, while imposing a lighter punishment than the statutory minimum to serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts