Government of Gujarat vs SIDHDHARAJSINH PRAVINSINH JETHVA — 682/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020010052026

Case disposed

Filing Number

682/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

682/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260278

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66(1)B
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

SIDHDHARAJSINH PRAVINSINH JETHVA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Additional District Magistrate Court in Khambhaliya convicted Siddhrajsinh Pravinsinh Jethva under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)) for driving without a valid permit and operating a vehicle under the influence. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of seven days and a fine of ₹2,150, considering mitigating factors such as his first-time offense, economically disadvantaged background, and family circumstances, while imposing a lighter punishment than the statutory minimum to serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional District Magistrate Court in Khambhaliya convicted Siddhrajsinh Pravinsinh Jethva under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act (Section 66(1)(b)) for driving without a valid permit and operating a vehicle under the influence. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of seven days and a fine of ₹2,150, considering mitigating factors such as his first-time offense, economically disadvantaged background, and family circumstances, while imposing a lighter punishment than the statutory minimum to serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case