Government of Gujarat vs AMIT BHARAT MAHETA — 681/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020010042026
Filing Number
681/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
681/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004260129
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
AMIT BHARAT MAHETA
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: CC.No. 681/2026 The court convicted Amit Bharat Maheta under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of alcohol. The accused voluntarily confessed to the guilt and requested lenient punishment. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), applying mitigating circumstances including the accused's personal situation and rehabilitation potential to impose a sentence below the statutory minimum, in accordance with established judicial principles favoring leniency when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC.No. 681/2026 The court convicted Amit Bharat Maheta under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 66(1)(b) for illegal possession of alcohol. The accused voluntarily confessed to the guilt and requested lenient punishment. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default), applying mitigating circumstances including the accused's personal situation and rehabilitation potential to impose a sentence below the statutory minimum, in accordance with established judicial principles favoring leniency when justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts