Government of Gujarat vs DILIPBHAI ALIAS DILO NATHUBHAI MANGERA — 676/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3-181,185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009992026

Filing Number

676/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

676/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260240

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 3-181,185

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

1.Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

1.DILIPBHAI ALIAS DILO NATHUBHAI MANGERA

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court convicted Dilipbhai alias Dilo Nathubhai Mangera under Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185 and 336, and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle without a valid permit while under the influence of alcohol. The defendant pleaded guilty and admitted the offense. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 2,450 and simple imprisonment for seven days as alternative punishment, considering mitigating circumstances including his first-time offense, poor economic status, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
09-Mar-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Mar-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 676/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Dilipbhai alias Dilo Nathubhai Mangera under Motor Vehicles Act Sections 185 and 336, and Prohibition Act Section 66(1)(b) for driving a vehicle without a valid permit while under the influence of alcohol. The defendant pleaded guilty and admitted the offense. The court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 2,450 and simple imprisonment for seven days as alternative punishment, considering mitigating circumstances including his first-time offense, poor economic status, and family dependence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.