Government of Gujarat vs NADIMBHAI SHAHNJAHA PIRJADA — 672/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009952026

Case disposed

Filing Number

672/2026

Filing Date

09-03-2026

Registration No

672/2026

Registration Date

09-03-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260339

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

NADIMBHAI SHAHNJAHA PIRJADA

Hearing History

Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

09-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The court convicted the respondent, Nadimbhai Shahnjaha Pirjada, under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees (one thousand fifty rupees) with an alternative of simple imprisonment for one day if the fine remains unpaid. The court found sufficient grounds to impose a lenient sentence considering the respondent's circumstances and rehabilitation prospects, while maintaining that justice required conviction under the applicable prohibition law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the respondent, Nadimbhai Shahnjaha Pirjada, under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, sentencing him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees (one thousand fifty rupees) with an alternative of simple imprisonment for one day if the fine remains unpaid. The court found sufficient grounds to impose a lenient sentence considering the respondent's circumstances and rehabilitation prospects, while maintaining that justice required conviction under the applicable prohibition law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case