Government of Gujarat vs HAMID HARUN BHAYA — 671/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009932026

Filing Number

671/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

671/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250374

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HAMID HARUN BHAYA

  2. 2.MUSA SALEMAMAD BHAGAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court convicted two accused under IPC Section 12 (dacoity) after they voluntarily confessed to the crime during proceedings. Considering their first-time offender status, impoverished background, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lighter sentence of Rs. 300 fine and 5 days simple imprisonment each, instead of the statutory minimum punishment, while also ordering confiscation of seized property and recovery of looted cash to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 671/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court convicted two accused under IPC Section 12 (dacoity) after they voluntarily confessed to the crime during proceedings. Considering their first-time offender status, impoverished background, and family responsibilities, the court imposed a lighter sentence of Rs. 300 fine and 5 days simple imprisonment each, instead of the statutory minimum punishment, while also ordering confiscation of seized property and recovery of looted cash to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case