Government of Gujarat vs KASAM ALIAS MATLO GANI SUMBHANIYA — 669/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009912026

Filing Number

669/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

669/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250444

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KASAM ALIAS MATLO GANI SUMBHANIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for an unspecified term along with a fine of Rs. 150. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, personal circumstances, and established legal principles to impose a lesser sentence than the statutory minimum, finding adequate and just reasons to do so in the interest of justice and rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 669/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act 1949, Section 66(1)(b) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for an unspecified term along with a fine of Rs. 150. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession, personal circumstances, and established legal principles to impose a lesser sentence than the statutory minimum, finding adequate and just reasons to do so in the interest of justice and rehabilitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case