Government of Gujarat vs KHENGAR DANA PARMAR — 667/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009892026

Filing Number

667/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

667/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250448

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHENGAR DANA PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees fine, with an alternative sentence of one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession and circumstances while imposing a lenient sentence, applying the principle that courts have discretion to impose lesser punishment when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 667/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 66(1)(b)) and sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees fine, with an alternative sentence of one day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's voluntary confession and circumstances while imposing a lenient sentence, applying the principle that courts have discretion to impose lesser punishment when sufficient and reasonable grounds exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case