Government of Gujarat vs JAYADIP ALIAS GOVIND RAMESHGAR APARNATHI — 658/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009732026

Filing Number

658/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

658/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260013

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAYADIP ALIAS GOVIND RAMESHGAR APARNATHI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Khambhaliya Court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 66(1)(b) for driving without a valid permit on a public road. The court sentenced him to two years imprisonment and fined ₹2,150, considering his first-time offense, poor socioeconomic background, and family circumstances as mitigating factors to impose a lesser sentence than the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 658/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Khambhaliya Court convicted the accused under Motor Vehicles Act Section 185 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 66(1)(b) for driving without a valid permit on a public road. The court sentenced him to two years imprisonment and fined ₹2,150, considering his first-time offense, poor socioeconomic background, and family circumstances as mitigating factors to impose a lesser sentence than the statutory minimum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case