AJIJBHAI JUMABHAI SURANI vs Government of Gujarat — 162/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWE on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC APPLICATION JMFC

CNR: GJDW020009662026

Filing Number

162/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWE

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260389

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AJIJBHAI JUMABHAI SURANI

    Adv. D V SAYANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court ordered the release of a seized Honda Scooty (Registration No. GJ-10-CA-8027) to the applicant/owner on bail with conditions, finding that continued detention of the vehicle would cause unnecessary hardship and prejudice the owner's daily work and livelihood. The court imposed four conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle before the court when required, must not sell or transfer it until the case is decided, both parties must appear with proper documentation, and the TPS officer must obtain photographs of the vehicle from all four directions for case records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Reply Of I.O.

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court ordered the release of a seized Honda Scooty (Registration No. GJ-10-CA-8027) to the applicant/owner on bail with conditions, finding that continued detention of the vehicle would cause unnecessary hardship and prejudice the owner's daily work and livelihood. The court imposed four conditions: the applicant must produce the vehicle before the court when required, must not sell or transfer it until the case is decided, both parties must appear with proper documentation, and the TPS officer must obtain photographs of the vehicle from all four directions for case records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case