Government of Gujarat vs DASHARATHSINH SATAJI JADEJA — 651/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009522026

Filing Number

651/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

651/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260080

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DASHARATHSINH SATAJI JADEJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Dasharathsinh Sataji Jadeja under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act for driving a vehicle without a valid permit while in an intoxicated state. The defendant pleaded guilty and the court, considering his status as a first-time offender from an economically weaker section, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹2,150 fine and seven days imprisonment instead of the statutory minimum, finding mitigating circumstances justified leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 651/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Dasharathsinh Sataji Jadeja under the Motor Vehicles Act (Section 185) and Prohibition Act for driving a vehicle without a valid permit while in an intoxicated state. The defendant pleaded guilty and the court, considering his status as a first-time offender from an economically weaker section, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹2,150 fine and seven days imprisonment instead of the statutory minimum, finding mitigating circumstances justified leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case