Government of Gujarat vs RAHUL SUKABHAI KHARED — 649/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009502026

Filing Number

649/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

649/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260025

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHUL SUKABHAI KHARED

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.649/2026 The court convicted respondent Rahul Sukabhai Khared under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendment based on the investigating officer's chargesheet. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and the court, considering the accused's circumstances and background, imposed a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one day and a fine of ₹150 (one hundred fifty rupees), with an alternative of simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court exercised its discretionary power to impose reduced punishment citing sufficient and reasonable grounds as per established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 649/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.649/2026 The court convicted respondent Rahul Sukabhai Khared under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 Amendment based on the investigating officer's chargesheet. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and the court, considering the accused's circumstances and background, imposed a sentence of rigorous imprisonment for one day and a fine of ₹150 (one hundred fifty rupees), with an alternative of simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court exercised its discretionary power to impose reduced punishment citing sufficient and reasonable grounds as per established judicial precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case