Government of Gujarat vs GAURAVBHAI ALIAS JATINBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAUSWAMI — 642/2026
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020009422026
Filing Number
642/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
642/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004260200
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
GAURAVBHAI ALIAS JATINBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAUSWAMI
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 05-03-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 642/2026 The court convicted respondent Gauravbhai Alias Jatinbhai Rameshbhai Gauswami under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for causing a breach of peace. The respondent pleaded guilty and confessed to the offense, citing his status as an uneducated laborer and first-time offender with family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court sentenced him to three months simple imprisonment or a fine of ₹300, with an additional two-day rigorous imprisonment in default of fine payment, while also imposing a bond to prevent future similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 642/2026 The court convicted respondent Gauravbhai Alias Jatinbhai Rameshbhai Gauswami under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for causing a breach of peace. The respondent pleaded guilty and confessed to the offense, citing his status as an uneducated laborer and first-time offender with family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court sentenced him to three months simple imprisonment or a fine of ₹300, with an additional two-day rigorous imprisonment in default of fine payment, while also imposing a bond to prevent future similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts