Government of Gujarat vs GAURAVBHAI ALIAS JATINBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAUSWAMI — 642/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009422026

Filing Number

642/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

642/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260200

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GAURAVBHAI ALIAS JATINBHAI RAMESHBHAI GAUSWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 642/2026 The court convicted respondent Gauravbhai Alias Jatinbhai Rameshbhai Gauswami under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for causing a breach of peace. The respondent pleaded guilty and confessed to the offense, citing his status as an uneducated laborer and first-time offender with family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court sentenced him to three months simple imprisonment or a fine of ₹300, with an additional two-day rigorous imprisonment in default of fine payment, while also imposing a bond to prevent future similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 642/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 642/2026 The court convicted respondent Gauravbhai Alias Jatinbhai Rameshbhai Gauswami under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for causing a breach of peace. The respondent pleaded guilty and confessed to the offense, citing his status as an uneducated laborer and first-time offender with family responsibilities as mitigating factors. The court sentenced him to three months simple imprisonment or a fine of ₹300, with an additional two-day rigorous imprisonment in default of fine payment, while also imposing a bond to prevent future similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case