Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYGIRI ARVINDGIRI GOSVAMI — 624/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020009212026
Filing Number
624/2026
Filing Date
05-Mar-2026
Registration No
624/2026
Registration Date
05-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185004260052
Police Station
JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANJAYGIRI ARVINDGIRI GOSVAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: CC.No.624/2026 The court convicted respondent Sanjaygiri Arvindgiri Goswami under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments (Section 66(1)(b)) for possessing illicit liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and was sentenced to imprisonment of Rs. 150 (rupees one hundred fifty) with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day under Section 275 IPC, considering the accused's circumstances, rehabilitation potential, and the principle of imposing minimum necessary punishment while maintaining social justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
05-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 624/2026
Case Summary: CC.No.624/2026 The court convicted respondent Sanjaygiri Arvindgiri Goswami under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments (Section 66(1)(b)) for possessing illicit liquor. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and was sentenced to imprisonment of Rs. 150 (rupees one hundred fifty) with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day under Section 275 IPC, considering the accused's circumstances, rehabilitation potential, and the principle of imposing minimum necessary punishment while maintaining social justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts