Government of Gujarat vs SANJAYGIRI ARVINDGIRI GOSWAMI — 623/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009202026

Filing Number

623/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

623/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185004260024

Police Station

JAM KHAMBHALIA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAYGIRI ARVINDGIRI GOSWAMI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 623/2026 The court convicted respondent Sanjaygiri Arvindgiri Goswami under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments, Section 66(1)(b), finding sufficient evidence of the alleged offense. The court sentenced the accused to rigorous imprisonment for 150 days (or a fine of Rs. 150 with one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's circumstances, position in society, and grounds for leniency while upholding the conviction based on established legal precedents regarding appropriate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 623/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 623/2026 The court convicted respondent Sanjaygiri Arvindgiri Goswami under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments, Section 66(1)(b), finding sufficient evidence of the alleged offense. The court sentenced the accused to rigorous imprisonment for 150 days (or a fine of Rs. 150 with one day simple imprisonment in default), considering the accused's circumstances, position in society, and grounds for leniency while upholding the conviction based on established legal precedents regarding appropriate sentencing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case