Government of Gujarat vs MAHIPATSINH ABHESANG VAGHELA — 620/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020009172026

Filing Number

620/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

620/2026

Registration Date

05-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 27-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250423

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHIPATSINH ABHESANG VAGHELA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.620/2026 The court convicted respondent Mahipatsinh Abhesang Vaghela under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense during investigation. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (one hundred fifty) with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day under Section 275 IPC, considering his circumstances, conduct, and rehabilitative potential as mitigating factors warranting lenient sentencing rather than the minimum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 05-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 620/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.620/2026 The court convicted respondent Mahipatsinh Abhesang Vaghela under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and Amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b) after he voluntarily confessed to the offense during investigation. The court sentenced him to imprisonment of 150 rupees (one hundred fifty) with an alternative simple imprisonment of one day under Section 275 IPC, considering his circumstances, conduct, and rehabilitative potential as mitigating factors warranting lenient sentencing rather than the minimum statutory punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case