KAYANATBEN W.O. SIRAJ HUSHEN SUMBHANIYA D.O. MAMAD OSAMAN SANGHAR vs SIRAJ HUSHEN SUMBHANIYA — 154/2026

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALA on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINALMISC APPLICATION JMFC

CNR: GJDW020009152026

Filing Number

154/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

154/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALA

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAYANATBEN W.O. SIRAJ HUSHEN SUMBHANIYA D.O. MAMAD OSAMAN SANGHAR

    Adv. D V KANABAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SIRAJ HUSHEN SUMBHANIYA

  2. 2.HUSHEN SIDIKBHAI SUMBHANIYA

  3. 3.AMINABEN HUSHEN SUMBHANIYA

  4. 4.SALAMABEN D.O. HUSHEN SIDIK SUMBHANIYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The judgment document is in Gujarati and is only partially legible. The visible content indicates this is a case from the Sojat District Court (Case 154/2025) dated March 14, 2026. The judgment references Section 280 of the CrPC and mentions proceedings in a public court, but the crucial details regarding the substantive decision, reasoning, and court's order are either garbled or not clearly visible in the provided document. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 154/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The judgment document is in Gujarati and is only partially legible. The visible content indicates this is a case from the Sojat District Court (Case 154/2025) dated March 14, 2026. The judgment references Section 280 of the CrPC and mentions proceedings in a public court, but the crucial details regarding the substantive decision, reasoning, and court's order are either garbled or not clearly visible in the provided document. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case