Government of Gujarat vs DEVASHI BHIKHABHAI GORADIYA — 600/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020008842026
Filing Number
600/2026
Filing Date
27-Feb-2026
Registration No
600/2026
Registration Date
27-Feb-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008260077
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVASHI BHIKHABHAI GORADIYA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Devashi Bhikhabhai Goradiya (C.C. No. 600/2026) The court convicted the respondent Devashi Bhikhabhai Goradiya under the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 185 and Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for operating a vehicle without proper permit and driving under the influence. The respondent pleaded guilty and the court, considering mitigating factors including the respondent's status as a first-time offender from an economically disadvantaged background, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹2,150 fine instead of the minimum statutory penalty, along with a 7-day imprisonment term. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
27-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 600/2026
Case Summary: Government of Gujarat v. Devashi Bhikhabhai Goradiya (C.C. No. 600/2026) The court convicted the respondent Devashi Bhikhabhai Goradiya under the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 185 and Prohibition Act, Section 66(1)(b) for operating a vehicle without proper permit and driving under the influence. The respondent pleaded guilty and the court, considering mitigating factors including the respondent's status as a first-time offender from an economically disadvantaged background, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹2,150 fine instead of the minimum statutory penalty, along with a 7-day imprisonment term. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts