Government of Gujarat vs HAMIR MEGHABHAI PARIYA — 599/2026

Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008822026

Filing Number

599/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

599/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260007

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Public Gambling Act, 1867 [Section 1 18] Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HAMIR MEGHABHAI PARIYA

  2. 2.ASIF SATARBHAI SUMBHANIYA

  3. 3.SATAR BACHUBHAI PIRAJHADA

  4. 4.UMAR ABDUL SANGHAR

  5. 5.AKABAR DAUDBHAI SUMBHANIYA

  6. 6.RAFIK AMADBHAI SANGHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted six defendants under the Gambling Act Section 12 for illegally gambling with currency in a public place. The court imposed individual fines of Rs. 300 on each defendant, considering mitigating factors such as their lower socioeconomic status and first-time offense, while imposing reduced sentences compared to statutory maximums to serve justice appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 599/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted six defendants under the Gambling Act Section 12 for illegally gambling with currency in a public place. The court imposed individual fines of Rs. 300 on each defendant, considering mitigating factors such as their lower socioeconomic status and first-time offense, while imposing reduced sentences compared to statutory maximums to serve justice appropriately. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case