Government of Gujarat vs RIYAJ JUSAB SANGHAR — 592/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008682026

Filing Number

592/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

592/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260033

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 281

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RIYAJ JUSAB SANGHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted respondent Riyaj Jusab Sanghar under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering life) for recklessly driving a vehicle at high speed and endangering public safety. The accused pleaded guilty and the court, considering mitigating circumstances including this being his first offense and family responsibilities, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹600 fine instead of the statutory maximum, along with seven days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Process To Accused

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 592/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Riyaj Jusab Sanghar under IPC Section 281 (rash or negligent driving endangering life) for recklessly driving a vehicle at high speed and endangering public safety. The accused pleaded guilty and the court, considering mitigating circumstances including this being his first offense and family responsibilities, imposed a reduced sentence of ₹600 fine instead of the statutory maximum, along with seven days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case