Government of Gujarat vs MANASANG LAKHUBHAI RATHOD — 588/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008642026

Filing Number

588/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

588/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260041

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MANASANG LAKHUBHAI RATHOD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.NO-588-2026 The court convicted respondent Manasang Lakhubhai Rathod under the Motor Vehicles Act and Prohibition Act for operating an unauthorized vehicle on a public road without proper permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and submitted supporting evidence. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,150 (with seven days simple imprisonment in default) as his first conviction, exercising discretion to impose minimum sentence based on his circumstances as a laborer from an economically weaker section. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 588/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.NO-588-2026 The court convicted respondent Manasang Lakhubhai Rathod under the Motor Vehicles Act and Prohibition Act for operating an unauthorized vehicle on a public road without proper permit. The accused voluntarily confessed to the offense and submitted supporting evidence. The court sentenced him to a fine of ₹2,150 (with seven days simple imprisonment in default) as his first conviction, exercising discretion to impose minimum sentence based on his circumstances as a laborer from an economically weaker section. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case