Government of Gujarat vs DHANASING FULASINH KUSHAVAHA — 586/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008622026

Filing Number

586/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

586/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260040

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DHANASING FULASINH KUSHAVAHA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC NO. 586/2026 The court convicted Dhanasing Fulasinh Kushavaha under IPC Section 285 (rash conduct endangering human life) for recklessly driving a vehicle on a public road, causing danger to life and property, and abandoning the vehicle at the scene. The court sentenced him to three months imprisonment and a fine of ₹300, considering it his first offense and his status as a laborer from an impoverished background, while warning against future criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 586/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC NO. 586/2026 The court convicted Dhanasing Fulasinh Kushavaha under IPC Section 285 (rash conduct endangering human life) for recklessly driving a vehicle on a public road, causing danger to life and property, and abandoning the vehicle at the scene. The court sentenced him to three months imprisonment and a fine of ₹300, considering it his first offense and his status as a laborer from an impoverished background, while warning against future criminal conduct. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case