Government of Gujarat vs RAM RUDABHAI LALAVANI — 583/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008582026

Filing Number

583/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

583/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260028

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAM RUDABHAI LALAVANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted Ram Rudabhai Lalavani under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b), finding him guilty of possessing illicit liquor. The court sentenced him to imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 150, with the option of serving an additional day's simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his personal circumstances and circumstances of the case as mitigating factors for imposing a lesser sentence than the minimum prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 583/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted Ram Rudabhai Lalavani under the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016, Section 66(1)(b), finding him guilty of possessing illicit liquor. The court sentenced him to imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 150, with the option of serving an additional day's simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid, considering his personal circumstances and circumstances of the case as mitigating factors for imposing a lesser sentence than the minimum prescribed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case