Government of Gujarat vs RUSHIT RAMESHBHAI PARMAR — 582/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008572026

Filing Number

582/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

582/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260036

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RUSHIT RAMESHBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case CC NO. 582/2026 The court convicted Rushit Rameshbhai Parmar under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code for trespassing on government property and causing damage. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and submitted evidence supporting the charge. Considering mitigating factors—that the accused is from a laboring class, uneducated, a first-time offender, and sole earner for his family—the court imposed minimum sentencing of ₹300 fine with one day simple imprisonment as alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 582/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC NO. 582/2026 The court convicted Rushit Rameshbhai Parmar under Section 223 of the Indian Penal Code for trespassing on government property and causing damage. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and submitted evidence supporting the charge. Considering mitigating factors—that the accused is from a laboring class, uneducated, a first-time offender, and sole earner for his family—the court imposed minimum sentencing of ₹300 fine with one day simple imprisonment as alternative. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case