Government of Gujarat vs NAJHIR ISHMAIL GAJAN — 580/2026

Case under Gujarat Fisheries Act, 2003 Section 21(1)(e). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008522026

Filing Number

580/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

580/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185008260003

Police Station

VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Gujarat Fisheries Act, 2003 Section 21(1)(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAJHIR ISHMAIL GAJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order

    The court convicted respondent Najhir Ismail Gajan under Section 21(1)(c) of the Gujarat Fisheries Act for operating a fishing boat without permission and violating license conditions. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt. Considering mitigating factors—that he is an uneducated, first-time offender from a poor family and the sole breadwinner—the court imposed a fine of ₹1,500 instead of maximum punishment, with discretionary imprisonment as alternate if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 580/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted respondent Najhir Ismail Gajan under Section 21(1)(c) of the Gujarat Fisheries Act for operating a fishing boat without permission and violating license conditions. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt. Considering mitigating factors—that he is an uneducated, first-time offender from a poor family and the sole breadwinner—the court imposed a fine of ₹1,500 instead of maximum punishment, with discretionary imprisonment as alternate if fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case