Government of Gujarat vs MAHEBUB OSAMAN GAJAN — 571/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008402026

Filing Number

571/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

571/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250408

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHEBUB OSAMAN GAJAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case 571/2026 The court convicted Mahebub Osaman Gajan under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for unlawfully carrying a firearm. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced to three months imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 300, with an alternative two-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's status as a first-time offender and his impoverished background as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 571/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 571/2026 The court convicted Mahebub Osaman Gajan under Gujarat Police Act Section 135(1) for unlawfully carrying a firearm. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the charge and was sentenced to three months imprisonment along with a fine of Rs. 300, with an alternative two-day simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The court considered the accused's status as a first-time offender and his impoverished background as mitigating factors in determining the sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case