Government of Gujarat vs DHARMENDRASINH JILUBHA VADHER — 567/2026
Case under Public Gambling Act, 1867 [section 1 18] Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJDW020008362026
Filing Number
567/2026
Filing Date
25-02-2026
Registration No
567/2026
Registration Date
25-02-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA
Judge
4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT
FIR Details
FIR Number
11185008260043
Police Station
VADINAR MARINE POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DHARMENDRASINH JILUBHA VADHER
GULABSANG KHENGARAJI GOHIL
GUMANSANG TOGAJI JETHAVA
MAHAVIRSINH DEVISANG JADEJA
BHUPATSANG KHENGARAJI GOHIL
SURENDRASINH BALUBHA CHAUHAN
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
PROCESS TO ACCUSED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | PROCESS TO ACCUSED |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.No-567-2026 The court convicted six respondents under Gujarat Excise Act Section 12 (unauthorized possession of liquor) after they were caught with contraband liquor at a public place. The respondents confessed to the offense voluntarily and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced each respondent to a fine of ₹300 (in words: three hundred rupees), with 5 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid, considering their economic hardship and first-time offense status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: C.C.No-567-2026 The court convicted six respondents under Gujarat Excise Act Section 12 (unauthorized possession of liquor) after they were caught with contraband liquor at a public place. The respondents confessed to the offense voluntarily and pleaded guilty. The court sentenced each respondent to a fine of ₹300 (in words: three hundred rupees), with 5 days simple imprisonment as default punishment if the fine remains unpaid, considering their economic hardship and first-time offense status. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts