Government of Gujarat vs VIJAY KISHORBHAI BAVA — 540/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008072026

Filing Number

540/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

540/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250424

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIJAY KISHORBHAI BAVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.540/2026 The court convicted respondent Vijay Kishorbhai Bava under the Gujarat Prevention of Dacoity Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 56(1)(b) for dacoity. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested leniency. The court, considering the respondent's circumstances and rehabilitation potential, sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 150 rupees (fine) under Section 56(1)(b), with provision for Day-01 (A) simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The judgment emphasizes that while the court has discretion to impose lesser punishment in cases involving adequate mitigating factors, it did so to allow the offender a chance for societal reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 540/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.540/2026 The court convicted respondent Vijay Kishorbhai Bava under the Gujarat Prevention of Dacoity Act, 1949 and Amendment 2016, Section 56(1)(b) for dacoity. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the crime and requested leniency. The court, considering the respondent's circumstances and rehabilitation potential, sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 150 rupees (fine) under Section 56(1)(b), with provision for Day-01 (A) simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. The judgment emphasizes that while the court has discretion to impose lesser punishment in cases involving adequate mitigating factors, it did so to allow the offender a chance for societal reintegration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case