Government of Gujarat vs FAYAJ MAHAMADHUSHEN BHUKHARI — 538/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008012026

Filing Number

538/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

538/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250421

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FAYAJ MAHAMADHUSHEN BHUKHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of CC NO. 538/2026 The court convicted accused Fayaj Mahamadhushen Bhukhari under IPC Sections 275 and 285 (rash/negligent driving causing danger to human life) for obstructing traffic and endangering pedestrians on a road by positioning his vehicle dangerously. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court, considering it his first offense and his status as an uneducated laborer from a poor family, sentenced him to a minimum fine of ₹300 with an additional one-day imprisonment as an alternative, along with a warning against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 538/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CC NO. 538/2026 The court convicted accused Fayaj Mahamadhushen Bhukhari under IPC Sections 275 and 285 (rash/negligent driving causing danger to human life) for obstructing traffic and endangering pedestrians on a road by positioning his vehicle dangerously. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime, and the court, considering it his first offense and his status as an uneducated laborer from a poor family, sentenced him to a minimum fine of ₹300 with an additional one-day imprisonment as an alternative, along with a warning against future offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case