Government of Gujarat vs RAMESHBHAI RUKHADBHAI PARMAR — 537/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020008002026

Filing Number

537/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

537/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250381

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESHBHAI RUKHADBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of CC.No. 537/2026 Case: Government of Gujarat v. Rameshbhai Rukhadbhai Parmar Decision: The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended 2016), Section 66(1)(b) for unlawful possession of alcohol. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees (one hundred fifty rupees) or, if unable to pay, simple imprisonment for one day, considering the respondent's circumstances, position, and mitigating factors to impose lenient punishment rather than the statutory maximum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 537/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CC.No. 537/2026 Case: Government of Gujarat v. Rameshbhai Rukhadbhai Parmar Decision: The court convicted the respondent under Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 (as amended 2016), Section 66(1)(b) for unlawful possession of alcohol. The court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment of 150 rupees (one hundred fifty rupees) or, if unable to pay, simple imprisonment for one day, considering the respondent's circumstances, position, and mitigating factors to impose lenient punishment rather than the statutory maximum. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case