Government of Gujarat vs JUNAS KARIM SANGHAR — 535/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020007972026

Filing Number

535/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

535/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250425

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)B

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JUNAS KARIM SANGHAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CC.No.535/2026 The court convicted the respondent, Junas Karim Sanghar, under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and requested lenient sentencing; the court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 15 days (equivalent to Rs. 150) or, if the fine remains unpaid, one additional day of simple imprisonment under Section 275 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 535/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CC.No.535/2026 The court convicted the respondent, Junas Karim Sanghar, under Section 66(1)(b) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and 2016 amendments. The respondent voluntarily confessed to the offense and requested lenient sentencing; the court sentenced him to rigorous imprisonment for 15 days (equivalent to Rs. 150) or, if the fine remains unpaid, one additional day of simple imprisonment under Section 275 IPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case