Government of Gujarat vs RAMESH RUKHADBHAI PARMAR — 527/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJDW020007852026

Filing Number

527/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

527/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT, KHAMBHALIA

Judge

4-Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILT

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11185007250382

Police Station

SALAYA POLICE STATION – DEVBHUMI DWARKA @ KHAMBHALIYA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMESH RUKHADBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary of Case CC.No.527/2026 The court convicted Ramesh Rukhadbhai Parmar under Section 65(A.P.) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering his condition, circumstances, and sufficient mitigating factors, sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 (instead of maximum penalty), with provision for 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addi CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 527/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case CC.No.527/2026 The court convicted Ramesh Rukhadbhai Parmar under Section 65(A.P.) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act, 1949 and amendments 2016. The accused voluntarily confessed to the crime and the court, considering his condition, circumstances, and sufficient mitigating factors, sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 300 (instead of maximum penalty), with provision for 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remains unpaid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case